Thursday, 20 April 2017

World War III Will Begin On May 13, And That's According To Mystic Who Predicted Trump's Win

Amid heightened tensions between the US, Russia and Syria, people have been dreading the penultimate consequence, that of a nuclear war. To make things worse, a mystic who had accurately predicted President Trump’s victory has now foretold the exact start date of WW3. 


Something that none of us wants to believe, but according to Clairvoyant Horacio Villegas, we are alarmingly close to a disastrous war. According to a report published in the Daily Star, Mystic Horacio Villegas the self-styled “messenger of God”, prophesied Trump's victory way back in the year 2015. 
He said that Trump would be the main reason behind the start of World War 3. He says that WW3 would begin 100th anniversary of Our Lady of Fatima’s visitation which falls on May 13th and that Donald Trump will be crowned the “Illuminati King”.

He also prophesied the world leaders would attack Syria – which in reality took place in the form of chemical attack – and that this would bring Russia, North Korea and China into the conflict states the report. 
ow that some hair-raising detail! 

According to his statement, “The main message that people need to know in order be prepared is that between May 13th and October 13, 2017, this war will occur and be over with much devastation, shock, and death.”
Villegas backs his predictions with those made by by Nostradamus.
Nostradamus had said, “Mabus will soon die, and then will come, a horrible undoing of people and animals, at once one will see vengeance, one hundred powers, thirst, famine, when the comet will pass.”

In Villegas view the Mabus of our times is he president of Syria, Assad, who will get bombed and killed and will further worsen the war. 

He says that a ‘very devastating’ ‘false flag’ or “attacks based on false information” will occur between 13th April and 13th May which will involve North Korea and Syria.
Credit: indiatimes

وزیر اعظم کو دو ججز کی جانب سے نا اہلی کا سرٹیفیکیٹ مل گیا،وہ اس قابل نہیں کہ ممبر اسمبلی رہ سکیں،بطور ملزم جے آئی ٹی کے سامنے پیش ہوں گے: افتخار چوہدری

اسلام آباد (ڈیلی پاکستان آن لائن)سابق چیف جسٹس افتخار چوہدری کا کہنا ہے کہ وزیر اعظم نواز شریف کو سپریم کورٹ کے دو ججز کی جانب سے نا اہلی کا سرٹیفیکیٹ مل گیاہے،وہ اس قابل نہیں رہے کہ ممبر اسمبلی رہ سکیں،معاملہ جے آئی ٹی کے حوالے کرنے کا مقصد ہے کہ مکمل تحقیقات کی جائیں لیکن وزیر اعظم کے ہوتے ہوئے یہ کام کیسے کرے گی۔
نجی ٹی وی اے آر وائے نیوز کے پروگرام میں گفتگو کرتے ہوئے چوہدری افتخار کا کہنا تھا کہ جے آئی ٹی میں ایف آئی اے کے ایڈیشنل ڈائریکٹر کے لیول کاافسر ہو گاجبکہ چیئرمین نیب پر عدالت کو اعتبار نہیں۔ نواز شریف اب تحقیقات کے لئے جے آئی ٹی کے سامنے بطور ملزم کھڑے ہوں گے ،جہاں اجمل پہاڑی اور کامران مدھوری جیسے ملزم پیش ہوتے ہیں، انہیں اسی بات پر استعفی دے دینا چاہیے۔ان کا کہنا تھا کہ سپریم کورٹ نے آج ثابت کردیا کہ وزیر اعظم بھی قانون سے بالاتر نہیں۔ جسٹس اعجاز افضل نے اپنی اوبزرویشن میں لکھا ہے کہ نواز شریف نے مل لگانے کے لئے بینکنگ ٹرانزیکشن کا نہیں بتایا اور نہ ہی یہ بتایا کہ پیسے کہاں سے آئے۔
سابق چیف جسٹس کا کہنا تھا کہ عدالتی فیصلے میں اہم یہ ہے کہ ہر جج نے اپنا الگ الگ نوٹ لکھا،پانچوں ججز نے ثابت کردیا کہ وزیر اعظم ایماندار نہیں، دو ججز کی جانب سے نواز شریف کے خلاف اہم فیصلہ آیا ہے۔عدالتی فیصلے میں کہا گیا کہ میاں شریف صاحب کے معاہدے کی فراہم کردہ کاپی بوگس ہے جبکہ فیصلے میں حسین نواز کے انٹر ویو کو متنازع قرار دیااورقطری خط کی مذمت بھی کی۔
ان کا مزید کہنا تھا کہ عدالتی فیصلے میں یہ بھی کہا گیا کہ وزیر اعظم نے لندن کی جائیدادیں کیسے لیں ، باتوں میں ابہام ہے جبکہ انہوں نے اپنی تقریر میں قطری خط کا زکر تو کیا ہی نہیں تھا،آپ نے قوم سے جھوٹ بولا اورغلط بیانی کی۔چوہدری افتخار کا کہنا تھا کہ فیصلے کے بعد حکمران جماعت مٹھائی کس بات کی بانٹ رہی ہے؟فیصلے کا ایک ایک لفظ پڑھا جائے گا۔
Credit: dailypakistan

Thursday, 13 April 2017

Jennifer Garner, Ben Affleck officially file for divorce

It's really over, despite all those wishful reconciliation stories: Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck are getting divorced, nearly two years after announcing their separation
TMZ was first with the news, followed by PeopleUS Weekly, E! and others citing anonymous sources that Garner and Affleck filed papers Thursday, without the aid of lawyers and in a manner suggesting a coordinated legal strategy. That will likely mean a mediation instead of an all-out fight in court.
Together, Garner filed a divorce petition and Affleck filed a response. Both cited irreconcilable differences, both are seeking joint physical and legal custody of their three children under the age of 11, and they are negotiating a financial settlement, according to the reports and the Associated Press.
Unlike some recent celebrity divorces, such as Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, Garner and Affleck appear to be on the same page despite dissolving what would be a 12-year marriage in June.
"We go forward with love and friendship for one another and a commitment to co-parenting our children," Garner and Affleck said in a joint statement at the time they announced their split, in June 2015. "This will be our only comment on this private, family matter."
Despite some early bad headlines (was Ben dating the nanny?), the two actors have managed to maintain a friendly, kids-focused relationship since they announced they intended to divorce, profusely praising each other in public and in interviews.
They have spent holidays together with the kids, and they have been seen together in public. When she was filming a movie in Georgia, he stayed with them at her rented home. All this led People to assert last month that their sources said the divorce had been called off, for now.
Now it's back on.
Meanwhile, the headlines continue. Affleck, a two-time Oscar winner, announced last month on Facebook that he had recently completed treatment for alcohol addiction. He lamented his return to the tabloids after the critical success of the Oscar-winning film Argo, which he produced and directed.
"This business tends to exaggerate highs and lows," Affleck told AP. "I've had legitimate lows, movies I didn't like, and I'm very proud of the movies I directed and so on. But you become a cast member in a soap opera that you're not writing. You get the script every day and you find out what your role is that day."
Credit: usatodayusatoday

Congress finds bipartisanship on animal protection issues

WASHINGTON — Congress has found something cute and cuddly to agree on.
Plagued by bitter division and fierce infighting, Republican and Democratic lawmakers have found rare consensus on legislation to protect dogs, cats, horses, tigers and bunnies from abuse.
In the first few months of the new 115th Congress, House members and senators have introduced more than a dozen bipartisan bills on animal welfare, including a measure to bar people from keeping tigers, lions, and other big cats as pets and legislation to outlaw the sale of shark fins in the U.S.
About half of those stand a strong chance of passage this session, said Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of  The Humane Society of the United States.
"I think we're positioned for success," Pacelle said. "You have such a diverse group of people — from conservative Freedom Caucus members to moderate Republicans to liberal Democrats — who have come together on an issue they know their constituents care about."
Americans' passion for animals is what's driving Congress to act, said Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., the new co-chairman of the bipartisan Congressional Animal Protection Caucus, which has more than 120 members.
"The biggest reason that this issue crosses party lines is that is has so much public support," said Buchanan, who was named the 2015 "legislator of the year" by the Humane Society. "About a third of my district is seniors, and most of them have pets that they love. I've had dogs and cats and horses myself, but I never realized how much passion there was for animals until I got this job 10 years ago. It comes up at almost every one of my town halls."
Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., co-chairman of the caucus, said Americans have become increasingly vocal about how much they care about their pets, wildlife and farm animals.
"Members of Congress are realizing that protecting animals is not just the right thing to do, it's also developing to become potent politically," he said.
Blumenauer said that point was underscored last fall in Oklahoma, where animal protection advocates defeated a "right to farm" ballot initiative that critics said would have allowed abusive "puppy mill" operators to shield themselves from laws against animal cruelty. Residents of the conservative state, which voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump in the same election, defeated the initiative by about 20 points.
Animal welfare advocates also helped pass a ballot measure in Massachusetts last year to ban extreme confinement of farm animals and an initiative in Oregon to ban the trade in ivory, rhino horns, and other body parts from wild animals.
Those votes have helped convince members of Congress from both parties to support animal protection laws at the federal level, Pacelle said.
"Supporting animal protection also allows them to soften their image with their constituents and show compassion," he said. "Animals help humanize them."
Among the bills that Congress is considering:
— Big Cat Safety Act: Reps. Jeff Denham, R-Calif., Walter Jones, R-N.C., and Niki Tsongas, D-Mass., teamed up to offer this bill to ban the possession and breeding of lions, tigers, leopards and other big cats by private individuals or unqualified exhibitors at roadside zoos. Thousands of big cats are being kept in people's backyards and basements or in poorly maintained roadside zoos, creating a serious safety hazard for the public while threatening the cats' health, the bill's supporters say.
— Pet and Women Safety (PAWS) Act: This bill would provide grants to domestic violence shelters who allow women fleeing abuse to bring their pets with them. Supporters say women are often reluctant to leave their abusers because they fear the men will harm or kill their pets. The legislation is sponsored by Reps. Katherine Clark, D-Mass., and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., and Sens. Gary Peters, D-Mich, and Dean Heller, R-Nev.
— Prevent All Soring Tactics (PAST) Act: This legislation by Reps. Ted Yoho, R-Fla., and Kurt Schrader, D-Ore., would outlaw "soring" — the intentional infliction of pain on the legs and hooves of Tennessee walking horses to create an exaggerated gait prized in competitions. There also is separate legislation to stop the drugging of race horses.
— Dog and Cat Meat Prohibition Act:  This bill bans the slaughter and trade of dogs and cats for human consumption. Although consumption is low in the United States, it does exist and is legal in many states. The legislation, sponsored by Buchanan and Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., would ban the practice nationwide.
— Shark Fin Trade Elimination Act: The bill by Sens. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., and Cory Booker, D-N.J., would ban the sale of shark fins in the U.S. Shark fins are sought by fishermen to fill the demand for shark fin soup. The fishers cut off the shark's fins and then throw the animal back into the sea to drown, starve or bleed to death.
— Humane Cosmetics Act: This bill by Rep. Martha McSally, R-Ariz., which has wide bipartisan support, would ban the testing of cosmetics on rabbits, guinea pigs, mice and other animals.
 Prevent Animal Cruelty and Torture Act: This sweeping legislation would create the first nationwide animal cruelty bill, empowering federal prosecutors  to go after people who abuse animals on federal highways, at a federal facility, or as part of a business that sells pets across state lines. It is sponsored by Reps. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, and Ted Deutch, D-Fla.
Credit: usatodayusatoday


COURT ORDERS DONALD TRUMP RESORT TO PAY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS AFTER STIFFING PAINT COMPANY

Donald Trump National Doral Miami golf resort has been ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to a small paint company after The Donald stiffed them for paint and other materials for renovations. A Florida state appeals court upheld an earlier ruling by a circuit court which Trump had appealed and now he will find himself paying out far more than if he had just paid the original bill.
Circuit Court Judge Jorge Cueto awarded the $32,535.87 Trump owed to The Paint Spot as well as attorney fees in July 2016. Because the law firm, Taylor Espino Vega & Touron, had taken the case on a contingency basis, a 75 percent fee was added by the court on top of the time billed by Daniel Vega, the lawyer who handled the case. The total Trump was ordered to pay at that time was $282,949.91.
But trump being Trump, he would rather pay his attorneys to fight the case in court than just pay people what he owes them. So he appealed the decision and claimed they had made a technical error on the paperwork, so he shouldn’t have to pay. Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals called bullshit on Wednesday, ruling “Trump failed to establish that it was adversely affected by the error.”
In the decision, the court also pointed to a segment of testimony from Jamie Gram, the construction manager with contractor Straticon.
“[T]he decision not to pay [Paint Spot] had nothing to do with a defective Notice to Owner,” Gram said, according to the decision. “They weren’t paid because Mr. Trump had already paid [subcontractor] M&P a decent amount of money of the contract … and there was still a lot of work that needed to be completed, so we used the money, M&P’s remaining balance, plus additional funds to pay to get the work done.”
Vega said on Thursday that the appeals court will most likely add on legal fees just like the lower court did, multiplying the total by 1.75. This means that Trump will end up paying almost $500,000 because he refused to cough up the $32,000 he originally owed. Admittedly, I suck at math. But this doesn’t look like that great of a deal to me. Just saying.
Credit: oppositionreporoppositionreport


Wednesday, 12 April 2017

Pet increase immunity of kids even before their born

On the off chance that you’ve been thinking about embracing a puppy or a feline, this new review may help you decide: As per research distributed in Microbiome, kids naturally introduced to homes with pets have more elevated amounts of gut organisms that ensure against sensitivities and corpulence. Specialists say that backhanded presentation to textured companions is particularly advantageous to babies in their initial three months of life, and even while they’re still in the womb.
This period has all the earmarks of being a “basic window of time when gut resistance and organisms co-create,” says lead creator Anita Kozyrskyj, PhD, a pediatric disease transmission expert at the College of Alberta. Disturbances to this advancement procedure—for instance, the presentation of remote microscopic organisms—can change resistance and have suggestions for long haul wellbeing, she includes.
Kozyrskyj’s review thought about fecal examples from 746 Canadian newborn children. A portion of the newborn children were from families with pets (70% of which were pooches), some were from families who had pets amid their pregnancy yet not once the infants were conceived, and some had no current pets.
The scientists found that infants from family units with pets had double the measure of two particular microscopic organisms, Ruminococcus and Oscillospira, that have been connected with decreased hazard for adolescence sensitivities, (for example, dermatitis and asthma) and heftiness, separately.
Notwithstanding when pets had been surrendered for reception before the infants were conceived, this advantage was still observed. This demonstrates pet presentation influenced the infants’ microbiomes in a roundabout way, with powerful microscopic organisms exchanging from the creature to the mother to the unborn tyke.
This bacterial trade happened paying little heed to the kind of birth (vaginal versus C-area), paying little respect to whether the children were breastfed, and paying little mind to whether anti-toxins were utilized amid birth. This is imperative, say the creators, as past research has demonstrated that C-segments, anti-infection agents, and not breastfeeding can all contrarily effect children’s invulnerability.
The nearness of pets in the house amid a lady’s pregnancy was likewise connected with a diminished probability that she would transmit bunch B strep microscopic organisms—which can colonize in the vagina and cause pneumonia in infants—to her child amid birth.
To get our best wellbeing guidance conveyed to you inbox, agree to accept the Sound Living bulletin
The review expands on many years of research demonstrating that introduction to earth and microorganisms can help youngsters develop resistance, and that children who grow up with pets have bring down rates of asthma and sensitivities, says Kozyrskyj. (This impact is most grounded with puppies yet is valid with felines, also.) “Pets have dependably been our closest companions and they have all the earmarks of being useful for our children as well,” she says.
However, additionally studies are expected to give authoritative proof that a “puppy mediation” amid pregnancy can really forestall sensitivities. “Our next stride is to seek after the ‘does it make a difference’ question, to decide the sensitivity and corpulence results of contemplated newborn children at ages 1, 3, and 5,” Kozyrskyj says.
What’s more, obviously, sensitivities and corpulence aren’t results of nature alone; hereditary qualities additionally assume a part. It likewise bodes well that children with pets have common insurance against hypersensitivities, since guardians with sensitivities are more averse to have mutts and felines in any case.
Be that as it may, the review’s outcomes were changed in accordance with record for whether the moms had asthma or sensitivities, and still remained constant. Kozyrskyj says her group’s discoveries “are free of these two conceivable clarifications.”
It’s not unrealistic to feel that pet introduction amid pregnancy would one be able to day be an official proposal from specialists, Kozyrskyj says. It’s even conceivable that researchers could build up a “pooch in a pill” supplement, she includes, for moms to take as a safeguard measure against hypersensitivities and asthma.
More research is required for these situations to really happen, in any case. For the present, families have another reason (on top of bounty as of now!) to cuddle up to their hide babies—and that incorporates mothers to-be.
Credit: secrets-newssecrets-news


Mysterious of Zam Zam water

Zam Zam water come from well which is very mysterious. Scientists are working to know the reality and secrets of this water but still are unsuccessful.This water is very unique,no where in world such water is found. Makkah is a city where ground water is not available easily if available very deep. Zam Zam well provide in very large quantity daily.
All over the Muslim love to drink this water because of it purity and properties as well as due to religious reasons. Scientist have found that properties of this water do not change on filtration and mixing with other water. Still scientist cannot find reason of mystery of this water.
Zam Zam well is very old,according to history it was produced in ear off Prophet Ibrahim. This well is providing water many thousand years continuously without ant break. While around its water is not available . This is miracle on Earth.Scientists could not find secret of this well.
Credit: secrets-news

Monday, 10 April 2017

Sexy Model Bradley Cooper and Irina Shayk's First Child's Name and Sex Revealed

There's a new mini Cooper in town!
Bradley Cooper and sexy model Irina Shayk welcomed a baby girl named Lea de Seine Shayk Cooper, E! News has learned.
"They are both extremely thrilled and feel so blessed," an insider shared with us. E! News confirmed Shayk's pregnancy in November, after she showcased a baby bump while walking the runway at the 2016 Victoria's Secret Fashion Show. E! News also obtained exclusive photos of Shayk, Cooper and their newborn out and about for the first time since news of the baby's birth broke. The family of three were spotted going for a stroll Venice Beach, Calif., over the weekend, stopping for a sweet treat at Jeni's Ice Cream Shop with best Moment.

Creadit: eonline


Sunday, 9 April 2017

چین کو خیبر پختونخوا گدے برآمد کرے گا۔

چین کو خیبر پختونخوا گدے برآمد کرے گا۔
ٖآج چینی قیادت کی فہم و فراست کا قائل ہوگیا، انرجی پروجیکٹس ریلوےاور انڈسٹری کی تعمیر نوازشریف کےذمےاور گدھوں کی
افزائش خان صاحب کےذمے!





PSA John Oliver Is Buying Ads on ‘The O’Reilly Factor’ to Educate Donald Trump About Sexual Harassment

The ‘Last Week Tonight’ host is trying to purchase ads to air during Bill O’Reilly’s Fox News program in order to teach the president a thing or two about sexual harassment.

John Oliver is not afraid to put his money where his mouth is.
Back in February, realizing that President Trump gets most of his ideas from cable news, the Emmy-winning Last Week Tonight host purchased a series of ads to run against morning cable news programs that sought to educate the Commander-in-Chief about the nuclear triad—something he didn’t seem to know anything about during his presidential campaign. The Oliver-approved ads took the guise of ones that regularly air on Trump’s favorite program Fox & Friends, featuring a cowboy opening up about his catheter.
Well, the comedian is at it again. On Sunday night’s edition of his HBO program, Oliver revealed that he’s attempting to purchase ad time to run during The O’Reilly Factor in New York and Washington D.C. in order to educate President Trump about sexual harassment.
“We have produced an ad to educate Donald Trump to air during The O’Reilly Factor in New York and D.C. We submitted it to stations on Friday, but weirdly, we haven’t heard back from them since—which is a little surprising, because we are one of the only advertisers offering to buy time on his show at the moment,” said Oliver.
The reason for the purchase is that this past week, The New York Timesreported that Fox News has been forced to settle five sexual harassment lawsuits over the years for a total of $13 million—all concerning their biggest and brashest star, Bill O’Reilly.

“Yes, Bill O’Reilly, who scientists hypothesize is kind of a dense nebula of boner and racism, has been paying out settlements for alleged harassment for years, and the details are pretty disturbing here, with the victims claiming things like verbal abuse, lewd comments, unwanted advances, and phone calls in which it sounded as if Mr. O’Reilly was masturbating,” said Oliver.
The Times report also revealed that two other women, including Dr. Wendy Walsh, have accused O’Reilly of unwanted sexual advances and wielding his workplace power in an unfair fashion. O’Reilly has denied the allegations, while Fox News’ parent company, 21st Century Fox, attempted to defend their star by claiming that none of the accusers attempted to call the company’s sexual harassment hotline. Meanwhile, as many as 60 advertisers have bailed on The O’Reilly Factor in the wake of the sexual harassment controversy.
One person is standing by Bill O’Reilly, however: President Trump. Yes, this past week, Trump told The New York Times, “He’s a good person… I know Bill. Bill’s a good person… I don’t think Bill would do anything wrong.”
“To recap this story for you: Bill O’Reilly needs advertisers and Donald Trump needs to understand sexual harassment. And here is where we come in,” announced Oliver. 
The British satirist then aired a portion of the ad he hopes to air during The O’Reilly Factor—featuring the catheter cowboy teaching President Trump about sexual harassment. 
“Repeated unwanted sexual advances or obscene remarks in the workplace constitutes sexual harassment. If there’s a power disparity between the two parties, well, that’s about as inappropriate as lubricating a catheter with hot sauce, partner. Why would you do that? I do not like pain when I cath,” said the cowboy. “And if you’ve got a friend who was accused of something like that over and over again, I might think twice about defending him, because that just contributes to a culture where women don’t want to come forward.”


Sunil Grover to be seen next with 'Laila' Sunny Leone

After all the controversies between popular comedians Kapil Sharma and Sunil Grover, the latter is all set to be seen on TV again.

Yes, for all the Sunil Grover fans, here's the good news. The actor is geared up to make an appearance on an app-based commentary of the IPL match scheduled on April 13 for UC news.

Dressed in cricket gear, Sunil Grover posted a small teaser for his fans talking about him live commenting on the IPL match. He will be joined by Laila, Baby Doll Sunny Leone for the live session.
Creadit: timesofindia

How Awful Is the Republican Megabill? Here Are Four of the Worst Parts.

By Jacob S. Hacker and Patrick Sullivan from NYT Opinion https://ift.tt/p8qFrEX via IFTTT